12 Best LapSafe Alternatives for Smart Device Lockers in 2026

LapSafe has earned a strong position in the smart locker market. Its lockers automate device loans, returns, collections, and IT service workflows, while the ONARKEN platform adds remote management, audit trails, charging intelligence, integrations, and asset verification.

For many organisations, that combination works well.

But smart lockers are increasingly becoming part of a much broader IT workflow.

Organisations are no longer asking only:

“Can we securely store and charge laptops?”

They are asking:

“Can a user get a working device, return a broken one, collect a replacement, borrow a loaner, or complete a deployment without waiting for IT?”

That is when teams start looking for a LapSafe alternative.

Some want pre-built workflows rather than configuring every process themselves. Some want a platform closely tied to ServiceNow. Others need device management for warehouse scanners, radios, rugged mobile equipment, or distributed enterprise fleets rather than primarily education-focused laptop lending.

This guide compares 12 LapSafe competitors according to those use cases.

And our #1 pick is ForwardPass — a smart locker platform built specifically around the recurring physical workflows IT teams manage every day: charging, loaners, repairs, deployments, and replacements.

How we evaluated these LapSafe alternatives

We did not rank smart lockers simply by the number of doors in the cabinet.

A smart locker should solve the workflow around the asset, not just provide a secure place to put it.

We evaluated each platform across six areas:

• Workflow automation. Can it automate real device processes such as loans, returns, repairs, replacements, and deployments?

• Asset accountability. Can IT determine who took which device, when it left, and whether it came back?

• Charging and readiness. Does the system help ensure that the next device issued is actually ready to use?

• Self-service. Can students or employees complete common device transactions without an IT technician physically present?

• Software and integrations. Does the locker connect with identity, ITSM, asset management, or other enterprise systems?

• Deployment fit. Is the platform better suited to education, enterprise IT, warehouses, frontline operations, ServiceNow environments, or another specific use case?

Workflow depth carried extra weight.

Secure doors matter. But the real value of an intelligent locker starts after the door becomes connected to a process.

LapSafe alternatives at a glance

Why look for a LapSafe alternative?

LapSafe is a capable smart locker platform. Looking at alternatives usually means that your requirements have become more specific.

You want workflows built around daily IT operations

LapSafe's ONARKEN platform supports asset lending, IT service desk processes, drop-off and collection, audit trails, device verification, and integrations.

But organisations evaluating smart lockers should ask how much workflow design will be required after installation.

Some platforms, including ForwardPass, take a more prescriptive approach by providing pre-built workflows for recurring IT jobs such as:

• Charging
• Loaners
• Repairs
• Deployments
• Replacements

That distinction matters if your goal is to shorten deployment time and avoid turning the smart-locker project into another internal automation project.

You run heavily on ServiceNow

For ServiceNow-first enterprises, the smart locker can become a physical extension of the service-management environment.

Velocity Smart takes this approach particularly far. Its lockers run natively within the customer's ServiceNow tenant, with asset movement tied directly to existing workflows and the CMDB rather than relying on a separate middleware layer.

You manage more than laptops

Universities often think about laptops first.

Warehouses, retail environments, manufacturing facilities, healthcare organisations, and frontline operations may instead need to manage:

• Barcode scanners

• Handheld terminals

• Radios

• Smartphones

• Tablets

• Laptops

• Chromebooks

• Tools

• Other shared electronic equipment

Traka, iLockerz, RMS Omega, and similar platforms explicitly address these broader asset-management scenarios.

You want a different software commercial model

Software can materially change total cost of ownership.

Power Technologies, for example, states that its PT-PRO locker software features are included with the purchase and that it does not charge recurring software subscription fees.

That creates a different procurement equation from platforms whose software is licensed separately or continuously.

You need a different deployment architecture

Some organisations want standardised lockers.

Others need:

• Custom bay dimensions

• Outdoor installations

• Multiple authentication options

• Mixed asset sizes

• Bespoke cabinetry

• High-density laptop lending

• IT vending

• Mobile-device charging

• Worldwide deployments

The underlying workflow may be similar, but the ideal hardware can be very different.

What buyers should know about LapSafe

LapSafe has several genuine strengths.

ONARKEN can provide live usage information, audit tracking, smart charging, device-loan workflows, service-desk processes, and AI-powered asset verification. Its service-desk offering also supports integrations with platforms including ServiceNow, Freshservice, and Halo ITSM.

Its loaning solutions provide 24/7 access while tracking loans, returns, and overdue assets.

That means buyers should not ask whether LapSafe is a “good” platform.

The better question is:

Which smart locker system best matches our specific operating model?

A university laptop-lending program, a ServiceNow-based multinational, and a distribution center issuing scanners at every shift change may all need intelligent lockers — but they should not necessarily buy the same platform.

The 12 best LapSafe alternatives in 2026

Each platform below is selected for a particular job.

Match the solution to your workflow rather than choosing whichever locker has the longest feature list.

1. ForwardPass: Best for automated device-management workflows

ForwardPass takes the #1 position for IT teams that want smart lockers designed around the actual lifecycle of a device rather than secure storage alone.

The platform automates five core workflows:

• Charging

• Loaners

• Repairs

• Deployments

• Replacements

Each is designed as a self-service process.

Users authenticate, complete the relevant device transaction, and the system records what happened without requiring IT to manually manage each handoff.

That makes ForwardPass particularly compelling when the real problem is not locker administration.

It is device readiness.

A laptop may physically exist in inventory but still be useless to the next person if it is uncharged, broken, inaccessible, already on loan, or waiting behind an IT desk.

ForwardPass is built around removing those bottlenecks.

Key features

• Automated short-term device loans

• Self-service returns

• Broken-device drop-off

• Repair-ticket creation

• Immediate loaner issuance during repair workflows

• Automated device replacements

• Device deployment and collection

• Secure self-service charging

• Remote administration

• Real-time transaction tracking

• User accountability

• Multiple locker sizes

• Built-in USB-C charging on current ForwardPass models

ForwardPass currently offers Enhanced smart lockers in 5-, 8-, 15-, and 23-bay configurations, all supporting its five core workflows.

Pros

• Pre-built workflows. IT teams are not starting with a blank locker and designing every common process from scratch.

• Strong device-lifecycle focus. ForwardPass connects charging, loans, repairs, replacements, and deployment instead of treating each as an isolated transaction.

• Self-service by design. Users can complete routine device handoffs without relying on an IT employee being physically available.

• Clear accountability. Device movement is tied to users and recorded.

• Designed for multiple environments. ForwardPass currently positions the platform for K-12, higher education, workplaces, and manufacturing.

Cons

ForwardPass is purpose-built around device operations.

Organisations primarily looking for general employee storage, parcel lockers, luggage storage, or broad facilities-management lockers may prefer a more general-purpose smart-locker ecosystem.

Proof

ForwardPass reports more than 22,820 loans processed over the previous 12 months, 17,350 devices charged, and 3,170 repairs submitted through self-service processes. It also reports customer outcomes of more than 120 minutes saved by IT teams per day and 80% less time spent on device management.

Versus LapSafe

The platforms overlap heavily.

Both can support self-service device access, loans, charging, IT workflows, and accountability.

The distinction is primarily one of approach.

LapSafe's ONARKEN presents a broad smart-locker management environment with asset verification, analytics, smart charging, lending, service-desk workflows, and integrations.

ForwardPass emphasises ready-to-run device workflows for five specific daily IT operations.

That makes ForwardPass especially attractive when the buying question is:

“How quickly can we automate the repetitive device handoffs consuming IT time?”

rather than:

“How broadly can we configure our locker-management environment?”

2. Traka: Best for shared operational devices

Traka is one of the strongest LapSafe alternatives for organisations managing high-value shared devices across shifts.

Its intelligent lockers can control and monitor laptops, tablets, smartphones, barcode scanners, radios, body cameras, printers, and other electronic equipment.

This makes Traka especially relevant to:

• Logistics

• Distribution

• Manufacturing

• Retail

• Hospitality

• Public safety

• Pther frontline environments

Key features

Pros

• Excellent operational-device support.

• Strong access-control heritage.

• Fault-management capabilities.

• Designed to scale from a few devices to large distributed fleets.

Cons

Organisations whose primary need is simple laptop lending in education may find Traka's wider operational-asset orientation more than they require.

Versus LapSafe

LapSafe has an especially strong education and IT-service positioning.

Traka stands out where smart lockers are part of shift operations and shared-equipment accountability.

3. Velocity Smart: Best for ServiceNow-centric enterprises

Velocity Smart is one of the clearest choices for organisations where ServiceNow is already the center of IT operations.

Its smart lockers run natively within the customer's ServiceNow environment.

That means asset requests, approvals, collection, returns, and CMDB updates can stay within workflows the organisation already owns rather than being synchronised through a separate platform.

Key features

• ServiceNow-native architecture

• Self-service IT equipment collection

• Laptop break/fix workflows

• New-starter provisioning

• Device returns

• Asset tracking

• CMDB integration

• Full transaction logs

• 24/7 self-service

Pros

• Excellent ServiceNow fit.

• Less middleware complexity.

• Strong enterprise IT focus.

• Device movement can reconcile directly against the CMDB.

Cons

Its biggest differentiator matters much less if your organisation does not use ServiceNow.

Versus LapSafe

LapSafe integrates with ServiceNow.

Velocity's proposition is more specific: the locker platform itself operates natively inside the ServiceNow tenant.

For a deeply standardised ServiceNow organisation, that deserves serious consideration.

4. iLockerz: Best for break/fix and operational asset management

iLockerz covers a remarkably wide range of smart-locker use cases.

Its systems can store, charge, issue, recover, and track laptops, tablets, smartphones, radios, scanners, tools, and other equipment using electronic access and cloud management.

Its dedicated Break/Fix Device Management Lockers make it particularly relevant to corporate IT.

Key features

• Laptop-loan lockers

• Break/fix lockers

• Integrated charging

• Cloud management

• RFID, PIN, barcode and biometric authentication options

• Audit trails

• Operational-device lockers

• Customised locker configurations

Pros

• Broad device support.

• Dedicated break/fix workflow.

• Highly configurable hardware.

• Suitable beyond conventional office IT.

iLockerz reports more than 1,000 systems installed and more than two million transactions processed across its installed base.

Cons

Its breadth means buyers should define the intended workflow carefully before selecting a configuration.

Versus LapSafe

LapSafe is particularly strong in automated laptop lending and education.

iLockerz becomes more compelling when the same organisation needs to manage laptops plus radios, scanners, tools, or other operational assets.

5. Power Technologies: Best for avoiding recurring locker-software fees

Power Technologies offers secure charging lockers designed around individually controlled access, device-level accountability, charging, and repair management.

Its PT-PRO platform includes Symphoni software and PiLOT Break-Fix functionality.

Most notably, the company says those software functions are included with the locker purchase rather than charged through annual subscription fees.

Key features

Pros

• No recurring software subscription according to the vendor.

• Strong charging capabilities.

• Supports laptops, Chromebooks, tablets, phones, scanners, radios and other devices.

Cons

Organisations should compare the included software's workflow and integration depth carefully against cloud platforms that use ongoing subscription models.

Versus LapSafe

This is largely a total-cost-of-ownership decision.

If recurring smart-locker software costs are a major concern, Power Technologies offers a materially different commercial model.

6. IVM: Best for enterprise laptop distribution and exchange

IVM's SmartLocker is purpose-built for the distribution, exchange, and tracking of laptops and other IT equipment.

Its core use cases include:

• Break/fix swaps

• New-hire onboarding

• Laptop refreshes

• Loaner programs

• Device returns

That makes it a strong choice for enterprise IT organisations that view lockers as an extension of endpoint logistics.

Key features

• Laptop check-in/check-out

• Badge, RFID or PIN authentication

• Chain-of-custody records

• Transaction notifications

• Device exchange

• Integrated charging

• Standalone or vending-system deployments

Pros

• Strong enterprise IT positioning.

• Good onboarding and refresh use cases.

• Clear chain of custody.

• Can combine lockers with IT vending.

Cons

Organisations focused primarily on education lending or general smart storage may find more specialised options elsewhere.

Versus LapSafe

IVM is particularly compelling where the locker project is part of a broader enterprise endpoint-distribution program.

7. Signifi: Best for enterprise IT asset ecosystems

Signifi combines smart lockers with intelligent vending and its SignifiVISION management platform.

The smart lockers provide traceable check-in and check-out of larger IT devices, while vending systems can handle smaller peripherals and accessories.

That combination can be useful when the organisation's self-service IT strategy extends beyond laptops.

Key features

• Intelligent device lockers

• IT vending

• Asset tracking

• Central management

• Usage analytics

• Self-service distribution

• Device return workflows

Pros

• Broader IT asset ecosystem.

• Good fit for large organisations.

• Handles both devices and smaller IT inventory.

Cons

If you only need a locker for a narrowly defined laptop-loan workflow, the broader ecosystem may be unnecessary.

Versus LapSafe

Signifi is attractive when a smart locker is only one component of a larger IT asset distribution and replenishment program.

8. RMS Omega: Best for warehouses and enterprise mobile-device fleets

RMS Omega's IT Asset Lockers are built around enterprise mobile devices.

They combine electronic access, built-in charging, item detection, barcode scanning, user restrictions, repair/service tickets, and modular locker configurations.

That makes them particularly relevant where hundreds or thousands of mobile devices support day-to-day operations.

Key features

• Built-in device charging

• Item and door detection

• Barcode scanning

• PIN, QR and RFID access options

• Repair and service workflows

• Modular expansion

• Ethernet and Wi-Fi connectivity

Pros

• Industrial orientation.

• Strong device-identification capabilities.

• Good fit for scanners and mobile enterprise hardware.

Cons

Education buyers seeking student-centric laptop-loan experiences may find other platforms more naturally aligned.

Versus LapSafe

RMS Omega is the more natural comparison for warehouse, distribution, logistics, and industrial device fleets.

9. Keynius: Best for highly customised smart-locker deployments

Keynius is broader than a pure IT-device locker provider.

That is also its strength.

Its platform combines locker hardware, cloud software, multiple access methods, APIs, analytics, role-based permissions, and highly customisable cabinetry. Its asset-management applications include IT equipment and other valuable shared assets.

Key features

• Cloud locker platform

• Open API

• RFID

• QR codes

• PIN

• Mobile app

• SSO support

• Multiple cabinet materials

• Indoor and outdoor options

• Live status and analytics

• Custom locker configurations

Pros

• Very flexible.

• Wide authentication choice.

• Strong customisation options.

• Can support many locker use cases on one technology platform.

Cons

Keynius is not exclusively built around IT device management.

An organisation may therefore need more workflow configuration than with a purpose-built IT locker.

Versus LapSafe

Choose Keynius when flexibility and customisation matter more than having a locker platform narrowly designed around one category of device workflow.

10. cora: Best for combining IT lockers and IT vending

cora positions itself as a smart IT vending locker.

Its workflows include:

• Self-service IT equipment distribution

• Laptop rollout

• Device exchange

• Replacement equipment

• Service-desk extension

• Asset rental

• Secure handover

• Remote laptop staging

That makes cora an interesting LapSafe alternative for large European enterprises and public-sector organisations.

Key features

Pros

• Strong enterprise process orientation.

• Combines vending and locker concepts.

• Useful for distributed IT service delivery.

Cons

Buyers outside its core markets should verify implementation and support coverage for their geography.

Versus LapSafe

cora is particularly interesting when the organisation wants to automate IT fulfillment, not just asset loaning.

11. D-Tech / Lyngsoe: Best for libraries and high-density laptop lending

D-Tech has historically been particularly strong in library technology and self-service.

Its SMART locker family supports charging, holding, lending, and other configurable functions.

Recent material describes SMARTcharge deployments capable of securely storing, charging, and managing large numbers of laptops, while its broader locker systems support self-service access and cloud management.

In June 2026, Lyngsoe Library Systems acquired D-Tech, combining D-Tech's smart-locker expertise with Lyngsoe's library technology portfolio.

Key features

Pros

• Strong library-sector expertise.

• High-density device capacity.

• Self-service heritage.

Cons

Its clearest differentiation is in libraries and education rather than enterprise IT service management.

Versus LapSafe

This is one of the most direct comparisons for a library or university laptop-lending program.

12. Bobnet: Best for flexible IT asset handover

Bobnet offers a Smart IT Asset Locker designed for storing, handing over, and tracking shared equipment such as laptops and peripherals.

The system supports controlled access and tracked usage and is positioned for hybrid workplaces, onboarding, offboarding, and shared-device environments.

Key features

Pros

• Straightforward IT asset-handover use case.

• Modular design.

• Suitable for hybrid offices.

Cons

Its published workflow depth appears lighter than platforms built around a larger suite of pre-configured IT processes.

Versus LapSafe

Bobnet is worth considering when the goal is relatively focused:

secure, trackable self-service IT equipment handover.

ForwardPass vs LapSafe: Feature-by-feature

Since ForwardPass is our #1 LapSafe alternative, here is the most important head-to-head comparison.

LapSafe's strongest differentiator is the breadth of ONARKEN.

It combines asset loaning, IT service-desk workflows, audit trails, charging intelligence, reporting, and AI-powered asset verification.

ForwardPass's strongest differentiator is its workflow model.

Charging, Loaners, Repairs, Deployments, and Replacements are presented as ready-to-use processes rather than simply capabilities a smart locker could potentially support.

The takeaway is straightforward:

• Choose LapSafe if you prioritise a broad configurable smart-locker management environment.

• Choose ForwardPass if you want common device-management jobs packaged into repeatable self-service workflows.

Where these LapSafe competitors stand out

The smart-locker category is much less homogeneous than it first appears.

ForwardPass

Best when the objective is automating recurring IT device handoffs rather than simply controlling locker doors or device access.

Traka

Best where asset accountability and access control are central to frontline operations.

Velocity Smart

Best for ServiceNow-heavy organisations that want physical device fulfillment inside their existing ITSM architecture.

iLockerz

Strong for organisations managing a mix of IT devices and operational equipment.

Power Technologies

Distinctive for buyers trying to avoid recurring software subscription costs.

IVM and Signifi

Strong when smart lockers are part of a broader enterprise IT fulfillment and asset-distribution strategy.

RMS Omega

Well aligned with warehouse, logistics, and industrial mobile-device environments.

Keynius

Strongest when custom hardware, authentication, and multi-purpose locker deployments are priorities.

cora

Interesting for IT vending, device rollout, and distributed enterprise fulfillment.

D-Tech / Lyngsoe

Especially relevant for libraries and higher education.

How to switch from LapSafe without disrupting device access

Replacing a smart locker is not just a hardware swap.

It affects devices, identities, workflows, integrations, physical locations, and user behavior.

Use this sequence.

The locker hardware is only part of the implementation.

The better system is the one that makes the entire transaction disappear into the background.

How to choose the right LapSafe alternative

Use the workflow that consumes the most staff time to narrow your shortlist.

• You want pre-built workflows for loans, repairs, replacements, charging, and deployments: choose ForwardPass.

• You manage scanners, radios, handhelds, and other shift-based devices: choose Traka.

• Your IT operation runs deeply on ServiceNow: look at Velocity Smart.

• You need highly configurable break/fix and operational-device lockers: compare iLockerz.

• You want to avoid recurring locker-software subscription fees: consider Power Technologies.

• You need enterprise laptop distribution, onboarding, and refresh workflows: compare IVM.

• You want lockers plus IT vending: look at Signifi or cora.

• You manage industrial or warehouse mobile-device fleets: consider RMS Omega.

• You want maximum cabinet and authentication customisation: look at Keynius.

• You run a library or high-density self-service lending program: compare D-Tech / Lyngsoe.

• You need relatively straightforward shared IT asset handover: consider Bobnet. 

The best system is not necessarily the smartest locker.

It is the system that removes the most manual work between:

“I need a device”

and:

“I have a working device.”

The bottom line

LapSafe remains a serious smart-locker platform.

Its combination of ONARKEN, intelligent charging, loan management, IT service-desk workflows, reporting, integrations, and asset verification gives it substantial depth.

But it is not the only way to automate device access:

• For shared operational devices, look at Traka.

• For ServiceNow-first enterprises, Velocity Smart deserves a close look.

• For broad asset types and break/fix use cases, consider iLockerz.

• For enterprise distribution, IVM and Signifi are strong options.

• For libraries, D-Tech / Lyngsoe remains highly relevant.

• And for the workflow that increasingly drives smart-locker adoption — reducing the repetitive IT work surrounding charging, loaners, repairs, replacements, and deployments — ForwardPass is our #1 LapSafe alternative.

ForwardPass does not treat the locker as the end product.

It treats the locker as the point where an automated device workflow happens.

That distinction is small on a feature checklist.

Operationally, it can be the entire reason to buy a smart locker.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best LapSafe alternative in 2026?

It depends on your workflow.

For organisations that want pre-built smart-locker workflows around charging, loans, repairs, replacements, and deployments, ForwardPass is our top pick.

For ServiceNow-native IT operations, consider Velocity Smart. For operational devices, Traka and iLockerz are particularly strong.

What is the best LapSafe alternative for laptop loans?

ForwardPass, D-Tech / Lyngsoe, iLockerz, and IVM all offer relevant laptop-lending or distribution workflows.

ForwardPass stands out when loaning needs to connect with other processes such as repairs, replacements, and deployments.

Its loan workflow allows users to authenticate, receive an available device, return it later, and have the transaction tracked by the system.

What is the best LapSafe alternative for IT repairs?

ForwardPass, iLockerz, Traka, and IVM all deserve consideration.

ForwardPass provides a dedicated Repairs workflow. A user can deposit a broken device, have the device ID recorded and a repair ticket created, and optionally receive a loaner immediately.

What is the best LapSafe alternative for ServiceNow?

Velocity Smart is particularly interesting because its platform runs natively in the customer's ServiceNow tenant and can tie locker transactions directly to ServiceNow workflows and the CMDB.

LapSafe itself also supports ServiceNow integration, so buyers should compare the architectures rather than simply checking whether an integration exists.

Which LapSafe competitor is best for warehouses?

Traka, iLockerz, and RMS Omega are among the strongest options to investigate.

All three extend beyond laptops into operational hardware such as scanners, handheld devices, radios, and other shared equipment.

Is ForwardPass a smart locker?

Yes.

ForwardPass is a smart-locker platform designed specifically for mobile-device management. Its current Enhanced models come in 5-, 8-, 15-, and 23-bay configurations and run workflows for charging, loaning, repairs, deployments, and replacements.

What makes ForwardPass different from LapSafe?

Both automate device access through smart lockers.

LapSafe emphasises the breadth of its ONARKEN management platform, including lending, IT-service workflows, analytics, smart charging, integrations, audit tracking, and AI-based asset verification.

ForwardPass emphasises pre-built workflows around five recurring IT jobs: charging, loaners, repairs, deployments, and replacements.

The better fit depends on whether you value a broad configurable platform or a more prescriptive device-workflow model.

Can smart lockers replace an IT service desk?

They can automate the physical handoff portion of many service-desk workflows, but they do not replace the entire IT service desk.

Smart lockers can handle tasks such as:

• Issuing loaners

• Collecting broken devices

• Providing replacements

• Distributing newly provisioned equipment

• Collecting returned assets

• Providing after-hours device access

Complex troubleshooting, configuration, security incidents, and other support work still require IT expertise.

The goal is to remove the repetitive physical transactions so technical staff can spend more time on work that actually requires them.

What should I compare before choosing a LapSafe competitor?

Look beyond the locker itself.

Compare:

A smart locker purchase should ultimately be evaluated by how much manual device-management work it eliminates, not merely how many doors you get.